Uncyclopedia:VFS/2013 January

Nominations for Bureaucrat (1 required)

Romartus (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom. --ShabiDOO 08:05, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Shabidoo but I prefer not to stand against ChiefjusticeDS for bureaucrat. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:03, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

ChiefjusticeDS (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom. --ShabiDOO 08:05, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
• This looks like chief is the only person who is qualified to be elected a 'crat and hasn't turned it down. Therefore, I propose 'cratting him now rather than going thru the farce of an uncontested election. --Mn-z 07:22, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
• HUGE For.--Funnybony  07:41, Jan 21
• Seconded per Mnbvcxz. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:00, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
• Acclamation. There are no other reasonable nominees and no legitimate reason for further nominations in the final six hours; and everyone active on this side has had a chance to speak. Chief is demonstrably committed to the continuing vigor of the Mother Ship and is its most stabilizing influence. Spıke Ѧ 18:08 21-Jan-13

  Actually, I beg to differ. I'm not adding my second nomination as expediency is important, however I'd like to add User:SPIKE as a second nomination on the condition that we have two new 'crats. With the loyalties of many with existing admin access leaning away from the site, we're now open to “Admin-only vandalism” much like HotAdmin4U's recent addition to MediaWiki:Sidebar. Given it's an unusual time the need for another 'crat to be able to remove admin rights is important for these cases (as neither of our precious 'crats are active here that much any more). Expecting one individual to be able to monitor this is likely to be problematic. While I agree with Chief's acclamation, I'd suggest a vote for Spike as 2nd 'crat should be held.                                • Puppy's talk page • 10:02 21 Jan

  If you show me a community vote to deop an admin I will happily do it. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

  The fact that you refer to the fork as the real site in your edit summary (making this a fake or pretender site) illustrates my point quite effectively. Your activity - or lack thereof - on this wiki is what I'm referring to. The issues with vandalism and off-site linkage disguised as “official” links to a splinter site by previously effective admins suggests that a 'crat focused on improving this wiki would be stepping in already, rather than having to have Wikia step in on our behalf. We need admins and 'crats who are focused here - not divided focus and muddled priorities.                                • Puppy's talk page • 11:48 21 Jan

  I think Zombiebaron is acting in good faith, until proven otherwise. A few words here or there don't make an attack. It would be nice to have two crats per Puppy, and I think Chief now rise to crat has gone smoothly without any interference from anyone at FreeUncy, which adds to the good faith all around. Aleister 00:08 21-1-'13 (just trying to keep one big happy family living in two houses well fed and happy to see each other daily)

(deindent) Maybe I should explain myself. I'm not doubting ZB's good faith. I do believe his loyalties are muddled however. This is not an issue for a standard user - people are free to edit either wiki. We may even say that on the main page somewhere. But as Frosty's recent abdication, Lyrithya's withdrawal from this site, and EMC's recent edits show, it's difficult to be the servant of two masters.                                • Puppy's talk page • 12:27 22 Jan

• Obvious For. Chief for the winz! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:33, 23 January 2013

Frosty‎‎ (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom. --ShabiDOO 08:05, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
• As Frosty now primarily edits the new site there seems to me very little point in having him run for bureaucrat here. If I am incorrect in this I am more than happy to re-instate the nomination, let me know on my talk page. --ChiefjusticeXBox 08:09, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
  • Vote for ChiefjusticeDS ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 20:33, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Aleister in Chains (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Boner. Because he keep refusing to become an admin.                                • Puppy's talk page • 01:03 17 Jan

  Evidently declined by Aleister 16:19, 2013 January 17‎. I'll just strike it through. Spıke Ѧ 19:27 17-Jan-13